| THIS SEARCH | THIS DOCUMENT | GOTO |
| Next Hit | Forward | New Search |
| Prev Hit | Back | Home Page |
| Hit List | Full Display | Help |
| Contents Display | ||
| Full Display |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
Beginning
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
SEC. 3. PURPOSE.
SEC. 4. WRITTEN CONSENT.
SEC. 5. NOTICE.
SEC. 6. DISCLOSURE TO WORKERS.
SEC. 7. RETALIATION AND COERCION PROHIBITED.
SEC. 8. REGULATIONS.
SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.
EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS
PURPOSE
COMMITTEE ACTION
COMMITTEE VIEWS
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
CURRENT LAW FAILS TO PROTECT WORKERS' RIGHTS
LACK OF NOTICE
UNION RESIGNATION REQUIRED
WORKERS EXPERIENCE INTIMIDATION AND COERCION
LOSS OF WORKPLACE RIGHTS
PROCEDURAL HURDLES
THE WORKER PAYCHECK FAIRNESS ACT
UP-FRONT CONSENT
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING DUES/NONCOLLECTIVE BARGAINING DUES
REMEDIES
NOTICE
DISCLOSURE
ANTI-RETALIATION/COERCION
CONCLUSION
SUMMARY
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION ONE
SECTION TWO
SECTION THREE
SECTION FOUR
SECTION FIVE
SECTION SIX
SECTION SEVEN
SECTION EIGHT
SECTION NINE
OVERSIGHT FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE
GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE ESTIMATE
CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
APPLICATION OF LAW TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
UNFUNDED MANDATE STATEMENT
BUDGET AUTHORITY AND CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE
CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED
LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1959
TITLE II--REPORTING BY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF LABOR ORGANIZATIONS, AND EMPLOYERS
REPORT OF LABOR ORGANIZATIONS
REPORTS MADE PUBLIC INFORMATION
MINORITY VIEWS
H.R. 1625 IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE ONGOING REPUBLICAN ATTACK ON THE RIGHTS OF WORKING PEOPLE
UNIONS HAVE A LONG AND PROUD TRADITION OF PARTICIPATING IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS, AND UNION MEMBERS ARE WELL AWARE OF AND...CURRENT LAW PROTECTS THE RIGHTS OF UNION OBJECTORS
IN 1988, THE SUPREME COURT MADE IT CLEAR IN `COMMUNICATION WORKERS V. BECK,' THAT NO WORKER CAN BE COMPELLED TO SUPPORT UNION...`BECK' RIGHTS ARE AGGRESSIVELY ENFORCED
H.R. 1625 IGNORES SUBSTANTIVE FLAWS IN LABOR LAW AND PROPOSES FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES TO THE LAW BASED ON DUBIOUS ANECDOTES
H.R. 1625 IMPOSES PROHIBITIVELY HIGH COSTS OF COMPLIANCE ON UNIONS
H.R. 1625 IS AN INVITATION FOR FURTHER LITIGATION
H.R. 1625 IMPOSES ONEROUS OBLIGATIONS ON THE POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF UNIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED OF NO OTHER INSTITUTION
CONCLUSION
DISSENTING VIEW
I. INTRODUCTION
II. H.R. 1625 CREATES NEW BURDENS ON EMPLOYERS, UNIONS AND EMPLOYEES
III. H.R. 1625 WILL NOT CURTAIL THE USE OF FORCED DUES FOR POLITICS
IV. H.R. 1625 IMPLICITY LEGITIMIZES COMPULSORY UNIONISM
V. CONCLUSION
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
| THIS SEARCH | THIS DOCUMENT | GOTO |
| Next Hit | Forward | New Search |
| Prev Hit | Back | Home Page |
| Hit List | Full Display | Help |
| Contents Display | ||