| THIS SEARCH | THIS DOCUMENT | GOTO |
| Next Hit | Forward | New Search |
| Prev Hit | Back | Home Page |
| Hit List | Full Display | Help |
| Contents Display | ||
| Full Display |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
Beginning
PURPOSE AND SUMMARY
BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION
HEARINGS
COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION
VOTE OF THE COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS
PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND TAX EXPENDITURES
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE
CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
SECTION 1: SHORT TITLE
SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON HUMAN CLONING
SECTION 301. DEFINITIONS.
SECTION 302. PROHIBITION ON HUMAN CLONING.
CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE
PART I--CRIMES
CHAPTER 16--HUMAN CLONING
Sec. 301. Definitions
Sec. 302. Prohibition on human cloning
MARKUP TRANSCRIPT
Prepared Statement of the Honorable Lamar Smith, a Representative in Congress From the State of Texas
Prepared Statement of the Honorable Steve King, a Representative in Congress From the State of Iowa
DISSENTING VIEWS
I. DEMOCRATS WOULD SUPPORT A BAN ON HUMAN CLONING,BUT H.R. 534 GOES TOO FAR
II. H.R. 534 WOULD PREVENT LIFESAVING RESEARCHIN THE UNITED STATES
III. H.R. 534 WOULD PREVENT U.S. CITIZENS FROM BENEFITTINGFROM LIFESAVING RESEARCH PERFORMED ABROAD
IV. H.R. 534 WOULD INTERFERE WITH STEM CELL RESEARCH--BOTH PRIVATELY FUNDED AND FUNDED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH
V. H.R. 534 WOULD BAN LEGAL AND UNOBJECTIONABLE INFERTILITY TREATMENTS AND TECHNIQUES OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
VI. H.R. 534 WOULD FREEZE IN PLACE STEM CELL RESEARCH BUILTON GENETIC DISCRIMINATION
| THIS SEARCH | THIS DOCUMENT | GOTO |
| Next Hit | Forward | New Search |
| Prev Hit | Back | Home Page |
| Hit List | Full Display | Help |
| Contents Display | ||