THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Contents Display
Bill PDFBillno should always have and extension i.e. h1.ih
Printer Friendly[Help] Congressional Record ReferencesBill Summary & Status
Protecting Resort Cities from Discrimination Act of 2009 (Introduced in Senate)
S 1530 IS
July 29, 2009
Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. ENSIGN, and Mr. MARTINEZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
- Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
- This Act may be cited as the `Protecting Resort Cities from Discrimination Act of 2009'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
- Congress makes the following findings:
- (1) Tourism, including conventions and meetings, is an important part of the United States economy that generates billions of dollars in tax revenues for many localities.
- (2) Analysts estimate that approximately 90 percent of employers in the travel industry are small businesses and more than 12 percent of United States employees are employed by the travel industry.
- (3) Many local economies around the country have developed into destinations for vacationers and conventioneers alike, and those local economies depend on the travel industry to support local employment, create new jobs, and generate tax revenues for critical public services.
- (4) These same destinations are home to large and small businesses that have unique skills, amenities, and resources for planning and facilitating meetings and conventions for all purposes and, consequently, may deliver value and convenience for individuals and organizations in need of a location for an official event.
- (5) Locating an official event in such a city frequently may save taxpayer dollars, as compared to other locations.
- (6) Agencies and departments of the United States have a responsibility to find ways to maximize taxpayer dollars in conducting official business, including planning and conducting official meetings attended by Federal employees.
- (7) In deciding where to locate an official government meeting by applying this principle of maximizing taxpayer dollars, government officials often will conclude that many locations known as resort destinations also will provide the best value and convenience for official meetings and business.
- (8) Resort and vacation destination cities tend to be affected disproportionally during economic downturns and, therefore, are especially vulnerable to discrimination by meeting and convention planners, which could exacerbate unemployment and related demands on United States taxpayers.
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON CERTAIN TRAVEL AND CONFERENCES POLICIES OF AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
- No agency or department of the United States may establish or implement an internal policy regarding travel, event, meeting, or conference locations that discourages or prohibits the selection of such a location because the location is perceived to be a resort or vacation destination.
THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Contents Display